Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.822911
Title: Psychological processes involved in psychosis symptomatology : the role of dissociation and reality discrimination
Author: Bull, Samantha
ISNI:       0000 0005 0289 1342
Awarding Body: University of Manchester
Current Institution: University of Manchester
Date of Award: 2017
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis has been prepared in a paper based format, comprised of three papers. Paper 1, a systematic review; Paper 2, an empirical study; and Paper 3, a critical appraisal and evaluation of the work. Paper 1 presents a systematic review of the association between dissociation and psychosis symptomatology. A systematic literature search was conducted using four electronic databases; Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase and Pubmed. Forty studies satisfied inclusion criteria for the review. These assessed the relationship of dissociation with hallucinations, delusions, paranoia, positive symptoms, negative symptoms and schizotypy. Significant associations were found between dissociation and all symptoms of psychosis, and this finding was consistent across clinical and non-clinical populations. Recommendations are made for future research to control for the high level of co-occurrence of different symptoms of psychosis, and to consider psychological mechanisms that may play a role in the relationship between dissociation and psychosis. Paper 2 presents an experimental study assessing a proposed two-hit model of voice-hearing whereby dissociation triggers voice-hearing in people already vulnerable to reality discrimination errors. An experimental study was conducted to assess the relationship between dissociation, reality discrimination and voice-hearing proneness in a clinical sample of 50 participants. Findings did not support the two-hit model of voice-hearing. Interpretations of the findings are discussed alongside consideration of limitations in the study design. Paper 3 is a critical appraisal of the systematic review, the empirical paper and the research process as a whole. This includes reflecting on strengths and weaknesses of the papers, and personal reflections on the experience of conducting research.
Supervisor: Berry, Katherine ; Bucci, Sandra Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.822911  DOI: Not available
Share: