Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.821251
Title: The environmental cost-benefits of improving pasture productivity on upland cattle systems
Author: Williams, Non
ISNI:       0000 0004 9358 6302
Awarding Body: Bangor University
Current Institution: Bangor University
Date of Award: 2020
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
A large proportion of the United Kingdom’s agricultural land is classified as uplands. The majority of this land is used for livestock production, but pasture productivity is often low. This, together with market forces and changes in support payments for agriculture, mean that cattle numbers in the uplands are declining. A continuation of this trend could compromise beef production and lead to other undesirable impacts such as the spread of invasive species. The red meat sector is also under considerable pressure to reduce its environmental burden. This may bring additional pressures on upland livestock systems. Optimised management of pasture is fundamentally important in maintaining grass quality and quantity, providing sufficient nutrition to ruminants. Improving pasture productivity and grass utilisation could provide numerous benefits such as increasing the length of the grazing season, thereby reducing supplementary feed requirements and decreasing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. While many studies have evaluated the effectiveness of pasture improvement methods on increasing pasture productivity, few have focussed on the environmental outcomes in relation to the uplands. An improved understanding of this is important for identifying opportunities to increase production efficiencies on-farm as well as reduce greenhouse gas emissions from upland cattle systems. The overall aim of this thesis was to determine the effect of alternative pasture and grazing management options in upland cattle systems on production efficiencies, and their respective environmental trade-offs. Firstly, a literature review (Chapter 2) was conducted whereby I discussed existing studies, as well as identified knowledge gaps in the research. Chapter 3, the first experimental chapter, assessed the current and potential pasture productivity on a typical upland farm in north Wales over a three-year period in order to investigate the environmental cost of various options to increase pasture productivity in the uplands. Pasture productivity was significantly higher following reseeding with a grass variety for marginal land than from current upland permanent pasture. Furthermore, higher nutrient (lime and fertiliser) application in accordance with the Nutrient Management Guide (RB209) resulted in an increase in pasture production. Field operations i.e. reseeding and nutrient application led to increased nitrogen loss via nitrous oxide emissions from the soil. This was particularly evident from rotovated land. In Chapter 4, the efficiency of upland grazing systems for cattle was evaluated by investigating cattle liveweight gain when grazing improved (pasture that received lime and fertiliser application) and unimproved uplands, and nitrous oxide emissions produced from the soil as a trade-off. This was assessed by conducting a field experiment, once again on a typical upland farm in north Wales. In contrast to existing literature, cattle liveweight gain did not differ between grazing treatments, possibly due to not utilising the improved pasture to its full potential. Urine excretion led to significantly higher nitrous oxide emissions from the soil than dung excretion and fertiliser application. In Chapter 5, the findings from previous experimental chapters as well as data from other sources were used to investigate the potential of upland beef production and pasture productivity at the regional level. Furthermore, land use competition for livestock production and afforestation in the future was examined. Many upland areas in Wales identified as potential sites for intensifying beef production overlapped with areas suitable for afforestation, indicating a challenge to accomplish both in the future. To summarise, this work shows that increasing the efficiency of upland beef production via improved pasture management and sustainable intensification is achievable for upland cattle systems in the future. However, the environmental impact of such mechanisms should be carefully considered to work towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Further work is required to quantify unmeasured environmental burdens from upland cattle systems.
Supervisor: Williams, Arwel ; Gibbons, James Sponsor: Hybu Cig Cymru
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.821251  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Cattle performance ; Fertiliser use ; Grassland ; Greenhouse gas emissions ; Reseeding ; Soil cultivation ; Sustainable intensification ; Upland grazing ; Upland land use
Share: