Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Exploring and developing domain-specific reasoning in primary English
Author: Oliver, Michaela
ISNI:       0000 0004 9355 0086
Awarding Body: Durham University
Current Institution: Durham University
Date of Award: 2020
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
The importance of teaching reasoning in schools is widely recognised. Yet this has presented teachers with difficulties, particularly in primary education. This partially stems from the lack of cohesive theory about reasoning for education, and the lack of specificity about it in the English National Curriculum. This research aims to stimulate explicit teaching of reasoning in primary English lessons. Drawing on socio-cultural theory and cognitive history, a theoretical framework of five reasoning ‘styles’ important within English has been constructed. Four main task structures were developed to explore the feasibility of targeting three reasoning styles in English lessons: genre-based reasoning (GRE), analogy-based reasoning (ARE) and language-based reasoning (LRE). Exploratory activities were used with groups of KS2 students from five classes across two schools. Two main group types were audio-recorded: researcher-supported and independent groups. Transcripts of 25 audio recordings from 11 lessons were coded using an adapted version of the Cambridge Dialogue Analysis Scheme (CDAS). Additional codes were developed to operationalise domain-specific reasoning in English. Examples of reasoning turns were analysed using the SOLO taxonomy to indicate the level of understanding demonstrated. The theoretical framework of reasoning styles and the accompanying coding instrument represent original contributions to existing research. Three main findings emerge from data gathered during the exploratory investigation. First, the three reasoning styles targeted in the empirical phase of the study are realisable in the primary classroom; they can be promoted, captured, operationalised, and measured. Findings indicate that students participating in these collaborative activities spent, on average, about one fifth of the total discussion engaging in domain-specific reasoning. Second, proportions of domain-specific reasoning appear to vary according to task structure used. Odd one out and diamond ranking tasks tended to promote domain-specific reasoning most readily. Third, proportions of domain-specific reasoning appear to vary according to the presence or absence of adult support in groups. Usually, having adult support increased the likelihood of students engaging in domain-specific reasoning in English.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available