Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.813977
Title: The production of the Anglo-Saxon laws : from Alfred to Cnut
Author: Ivarsen, Ingrid
ISNI:       0000 0004 9352 9439
Awarding Body: University of St Andrews
Current Institution: University of St Andrews
Date of Award: 2020
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 29 May 2025
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis examines the production of written law in Anglo-Saxon England by asking some basic questions. What is ‘an Anglo-Saxon law'? Where and when were surviving laws made? Who wrote them? What characterizes the laws as texts? These questions are answered using the laws' language, text and form as evidence. In the first part of the thesis, I argue that the modern idea of what makes ‘an Anglo-Saxon law' is adopted from editions, specifically Felix Liebermann's 1903 Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen. I show that the corpus presented in this edition is not just a product of Liebermann's own political, academic and legal contexts, but also those of his editorial predecessors. By relying on such a corpus we have constructed our view of Anglo-Saxon law and legislation on unstable foundations. Therefore, I offer a new corpus of laws and set out the criteria for texts' inclusion. I also propose a new way in which to categorize surviving legislation, arguing that there are two main categories: law codes and decrees. The second half of the thesis examines the production of the texts belonging to each of these categories. A key finding is that not all laws were produced in the same way. Some texts fit into the traditional model for the production of legislation, namely that it was done in relation to meetings between the king and witan. Some surviving texts may even be records of oral assembly proceedings. However, other texts appear to have been produced outwith an assembly context, including some that must have been made through long processes of research, compilation and juridical thinking. The evidence provided by language, text and form thus suggests that the production of Anglo-Saxon law was flexible and that the relationship between writing and law was complex and varied.
Supervisor: Humfress, Caroline ; Hudson, John Sponsor: Institute of Historical Research ; University of London ; University of St Andrews
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.813977  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Law ; Anglo-Saxon history
Share: