Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.809425
Title: The burden of Barrett's oesophagus
Author: Britton, James
Awarding Body: University of Manchester
Current Institution: University of Manchester
Date of Award: 2020
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Barrett's oesophagus is a well-established and increasingly common precancerous condition which requires long term endoscopic surveillance. Undoubtedly this may impact patients both physically and psychologically. However, very little is known about the true burden of this condition and its care pathways on patients' quality of life. This thesis presents a body of work, in journal format, which aims to give both an in-depth qualitative account of disease impact and quantitative assessment of the prevalence of these factors. Finally, this thesis identifies broader patient centred research uncertainties, which if investigated will hopefully shift the landscape of research in favour of the patient. The chapters presented in this thesis include an introductory literature review which highlights what is currently known, limitations of research to date, and gaps in knowledge concerning BO health related quality of life. The following two chapters (chapters 2 and 3) adopt a mixed method approach (qualitative and quantitative) to assessing BO health related quality of life. These chapters address the impact of symptoms, worry of oesophageal cancer, anxiety, depression, perceptions of cancer risk, experiences of follow up care and patient views on new follow up systems. Chapter 4 then looks at the broader issues facing patients with BO and GORD by asking what are their key future research priorities. This qualitative and quantitative prioritisation process engages both patients and professionals on a level playing. This process culminates in a modified Delphi process to reach a consensus "top 10 research priorities". Chapter 5 begins to assesses the potential benefits of a dedicated BO surveillance service, a top 10 research priority identified in chapter 4. Finally, a discussion chapter brings together the key findings from all 4 journal articles before outlining future research proposals in abstract format.
Supervisor: Mclaughlin, John ; Hamdy, Shaheen ; Ang, Yeng Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.809425  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Research Priority Setting ; Quality of Life ; Barrett's oesophagus
Share: