Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.805269
Title: Restorative justice : understanding the enablers and barriers to victim participation in England and Wales
Author: Banwell-Moore, Rebecca
Awarding Body: University of Sheffield
Current Institution: University of Sheffield
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 14 May 2021
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Since 2012 there has been significant government support for the expansion and use of restorative justice (hereafter, RJ) within the criminal justice system in England and Wales. This accords with not only international and national instruments but also good practice guidance that endorses RJ as a key justice mechanism. Nonetheless, evidence suggests very few victims participate or get the opportunity to participate in a RJ process. This thesis explores the key factors that inhibit or, conversely, enable victims’ participation and the remedial action required to ensure participation levels are increased. The way the offer of RJ was made by criminal justice organisations within two separate police forces was explored through participant observation, semi-structured interviews (n=89) and analysis of official documents in order to understand and determine how the culture, mechanisms and approaches of criminal justice organisations and RJ services influenced and affected victim participation. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with victims (n=24) and provided an understanding, from the victims’ perspectives, of their experiences of RJ and how the offer of RJ was made and received. The thesis argues that ‘institutional inertia’ combined with the culture, mechanisms and approaches adopted by criminal justice professionals’ impact upon whether victims are given the opportunity to participate in a RJ intervention and subsequent participation. The findings of this study suggest that criminal justice professionals subjectively select ‘ideal RJ victims’ and do not make proactive and systematic offers of RJ to all victims. In stark contradiction to the RJ principle of ‘inclusivity’ victims are excluded and not routinely offered RJ. If RJ is to be fully integrated into the organisational culture and ethos of criminal justice then its agencies need to develop a culture of RJ based upon the principles of inclusivity and engagement, thus ensuring equal access to RJ for all victims.
Supervisor: Shapland, Joanna Sponsor: Economic and Social Research Council
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.805269  DOI: Not available
Share: