Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.804051
Title: But what about us? : partner and family experiences of perinatal mental health care
Author: Lever Taylor, Billie
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2020
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Partners and wider families play a vital role in relation to women’s perinatal mental health. Clinical guidelines in the UK and internationally recommend that services treating women with perinatal mental health difficulties involve and support their families too. Yet, little is known about experiences of family inclusion in practice. I set out to address this. This thesis was connected to a wider study exploring experiences of perinatal mental health care in England. The broader study (for which I was the main researcher) included semi-structured interviews with 52 women who received treatment for a perinatal mental health difficulty, and 32 partners/family members identified by the women as offering them some support. I included questions within these 84 interviews about how services work with partners and families and examined responses using dyadic and thematic analysis. I found that families and family dynamics are central to understanding women’s perinatal mental health and interactions with services. Although it was the women who were diagnosed with perinatal mental health problems, their difficulties were often embedded within a complex and fraught interpersonal and wider social context. Yet instead of seeking to understand perinatal distress within this broader context – or critiquing the structures and gender norms that contributed to producing and maintaining it – services tended to focus on individual women (and babies), marginalising their families and diverting attention from the need for broader social change. The complexity of involving and supporting partners and wider families, coupled with anxiety about this among women and their families, reinforced the tendency to exclude families. I conclude that involving women’s families and providing the support they need is challenging but important. Services need to find ways to overcome barriers to family inclusion and to proactively challenge problematic gender norms and expectations, rather than allowing these to shape and guide practice.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.804051  DOI: Not available
Share: