Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.802011
Title: Pavlovian conditioning : how excitation and inhibition determine ideomotion
Author: Iliescu, Adela Florentina
ISNI:       0000 0004 8508 9584
Awarding Body: Cardiff University
Current Institution: Cardiff University
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Associative theories assume a simple ordinal mapping between the strength of an association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) and conditioned behaviour in an experimental preparation. Recent studies that have taken multiple measures of conditioned behaviour challenge this assumption. The pur- pose of this thesis is a better understanding of the nature of these individual differences in Pavlovian conditioning, combining empirical evidence with theoretical development. It has been observed that simple auto-shaping procedures result in marked individual differences: some rats show learning by interacting with the sign (sign-trackers, STs), others by interacting with the food-well or the goal (goal-trackers, GTs). In Chapter 2, I examined the sensitivity of these two behaviours (sign-tracking and goal-tracking) to changing contingencies. In both STs and GTs, US-oriented behaviour was more sensitive to contingency changes than CS-oriented behaviour. Most attempts to ex- plain this dissociation have appealed to a dual-mechanisms approach. In Chapter 3, I present a new theoretical model, HeiDI, which integrates learning and performance from a single-process perspective. In Chapter 4, I examine two of these predictions. The first prediction relates to how the US-value affects the distribution of conditioned behaviour. According to HeiDI, a higher US-value will result in higher levels of goal-tracking in contrast with lower US value. Experiment 3 suggested that that a higher US-value results in more CS-oriented behaviour, however this was not replicated in Experiment 4. The second prediction concerns an analysis of the feature positive effect, where the discrimination emerges more readily for a feature positive design. HeiDI predicts that a feature positive effect should be more evident in CS-oriented behaviour. Experiments 4 and 5 addressed this prediction, however the animals did not show learning in the feature negative design. The implications of the new findings and the new model are discussed in Chapter 5.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.802011  DOI: Not available
Keywords: BF Psychology
Share: