Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.800030
Title: Voluntariness, consent, and justification
Author: Kiener, Maximilian
ISNI:       0000 0004 8507 2061
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2020
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
When we consent to something (e.g. a medical procedure, sex, a tattoo), we permit people to act in ways that would otherwise be legally or morally impermissible. However, in order for consent to be valid, certain conditions must be met. In this thesis, I discuss the condition that consent needs to be voluntary, I focus specifically on consent to medical procedures, and I argue that such consent is voluntary unless it is motivated by an influence that cannot be interpersonally justified. I call my view Interpersonal Consenter-Consentee Justification (ICCJ). ICCJ introduces the concept of interpersonal justification, known from the debate on contractualism, to the debate on consent and most clearly differs from other views in the literature by (i) focusing on the reasons or motivation for which a person consents, instead of mere causal links or counterfactuals, (ii) allowing the moral legitimacy and not just the strength of an influence to have a bearing on the voluntariness of consent, and (iii) making the behaviour of the person receiving consent (the consentee) central to its approach.
Supervisor: Wilkinson, Dominic ; Hyman, John Sponsor: Arts and Humanities Research Council
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.800030  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Clinical Trials ; Consent ; Medical ethics ; Coercion
Share: