Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.799764
Title: Ibn Taymiyya's views on issues of divorce in contrast to the majority of jurists in Islamic law
Author: Ahmed, Seerwan
Awarding Body: University of Nottingham
Current Institution: University of Nottingham
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 20 Dec 2020
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This study examines and investigates Ibn Taymiyya's opinions on issues regarding divorce in Islamic law, which disagreed with the majority of jurists' opinions. The study aims to fill an existing gap in the field of Sunnī Islamic law related to Ibn Taymiyya's dispute with the majority of jurists regarding divorce law. In light of the available findings, it is noted that Ibn Taymiyya had opinions regarding some issues of divorce in Islamic law different to most contemporary jurists as well as those who came before him. These issues include divorce during a woman's menstruation period, triple divorce, intoxicated divorce, divorce pronounced in angry circumstances, a father's divorce on behalf of his young or mentally incapacitated son, a proxy divorce of a client wife, and divorce oaths. This study found that Ibn Taymiyya, in contrast to the majority of jurists, used his interpretations, understandings and knowledge when attempting to use any evidence from the Qurʾān and the Sunna. The findings show that Ibn Taymiyya's approach to aspects of each of the principles of jurisprudential ultimately evolved into reasons that supported his disagreements with the majority of jurists. This conclusion will support the idea that Ibn Taymiyya worked as an absolute mujtahid in the later years of his life and was not personally affiliated with any particular Sunnī school of law, not even the Ḥanbalī School to which he belonged earlier in his life.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.799764  DOI: Not available
Keywords: KB Religious law
Share: