Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.799739
Title: History-making in an unequal present : three perspectives on migration pasts in the North East of England
Author: Wieser, Leonie
Awarding Body: Northumbria University
Current Institution: Northumbria University
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis investigates how knowledge about the past matters for specific actors in the present, as well as for wider society. It examines the motivations and positioning of academic, museum and bottom-up knowledge-makers to consider how their perspectives add to our understanding of the past, as well as the functions of histories in a structurally unequal society. In the academic literature, the knowledge-claims of bottom-up perspectives, and the positioning of this knowledge as of public concern, have not been investigated thoroughly, nor have the specific effects in the present of these different practices of knowledge-making about the past been fully examined. A comparative approach to knowledge-making in academic, museum and bottom-up settings elucidates how knowledge and power interact in an unequal present. To answer these questions, this thesis has identified examples of each perspective, using the case study of migration to the North East of England. It employs a critical qualitative methodology including interviews, participant observation and text analysis of knowledge-makers and their products in all three fields. This thesis found that while the academic perspective presented its knowledge-making as more detached than the other two perspectives, all three approaches considered knowledge about the past as having use in the present, either intellectually or practically. It further found that varying conceptions of what issues counted as important to wider society, and thus public, had potentially negative effects in terms of people's access to the public sphere. The histories produced by all three perspectives, and their practices, were found to have wider implications. Especially the bottom-up perspective aimed to transform wider structures of knowledge-making as well as the societal valorisation of specific pasts. These findings are important in understanding the practices of history-making as having specific - perpetuating or challenging -- functions within wider societal structures of racism and inequality.
Supervisor: Ashley, Susan Sponsor: Arts and Humanities Research Council
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.799739  DOI: Not available
Keywords: L700 Human and Social Geography ; V200 History by area ; V300 History by topic ; V900 Others in Historical and Philosophical studies
Share: