Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.798462
Title: Reconsidering palaeoepidemiological investigations in palaeo-oncology
Author: Siek, Thomas James
ISNI:       0000 0004 8507 5326
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Palaeo-oncology refers to the study of cancer and other forms of neoplastic disease in historical and archaeological contexts using bioarchaeological data and methodology. In this line of academic enquiry there is debate regarding the antiquity and prevalence of neoplasms, which has been bolstered by a limited number of palaeoepidemiological studies into neoplastic disease. These investigations into neoplastic prevalence have been infrequent and performed with limited effectiveness. Moreover, these studies remain independent entities of scholarship, differing in their methods and analyses. This thesis will reconsider palaeoepidemiological investigations into neoplastic disease and attempt to bring these lines of enquiry together. This will first be accomplished with a systematic review of bioarchaeological research in palaeo-oncology. The systematic review will be a double-pronged endeavour that will fill a gap in the bioarchaeological literature by examining how palaeopathology has approached neoplastic research and by filtering out and scrutinising past palaeoepidemiological studies. This will then lead to a palaeoepidemiological investigation, conducted in reference to medieval Poland and will be aimed at exemplifying and incorporating a more standardized palaeoepidemiological methodology into palaeo-oncology. The systematic review revealed palaeo-oncological scholarship is dominated by case reports and identified only 10 enquiries into neoplastic prevalence since 1970. These previous palaeoepidemiological studies did not use proper methodology to interpret their results and, as they did not provide enough detail regarding the assemblage's demographic profile, these studies preclude themselves from any in-depth comparison. The methodology used in the palaeoepidemiological investigation proved effective when comparing neoplastic prevalence in regard to urban versus rural medieval Polish assemblages. These methods will form the basis of proposed protocols for future palaeo-oncological research regarding palaeoepidemiological investigations and offer suggestions for future research venues into neoplastic disease.
Supervisor: Waldron, T. ; Rando, C. Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.798462  DOI: Not available
Share: