Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Rough volatility and portfolio optimisation under small transaction costs
Author: Schelling, Denis Matthias
ISNI:       0000 0004 8507 2723
Awarding Body: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Current Institution: London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
The first chapter of the thesis presents the study of the linear-quadratic ergodic control problem of fractional Brownian motion. Ergodic control problems arise naturally in the context of small cost asymptotic expansion of utility maximisation problems with frictions. The optimal solution to the ergodic control problem is derived through the use of an infinite dimensional Markovian representation of fractional Brownian motion as a superposition of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. This solution then allows to compute explicit formulas for the minimised objective value through the variance of the stationary distribution of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes. Building on the first chapter, the second chapter of the thesis presents the main result. This is motivated by the problem an agent faces when trying to minimise her utility loss in the presence of quadratic trading costs in a rough volatility model. Minimising the utility loss amounts to studying a tracking problem of a target that depends on the rough volatility process. This tracking problem is minimised at leading order by an asymptotically optimal strategy that is closely linked to the ergodic control problem of fractional Brownian motion. This asymptotically optimal strategy is explicitly derived. Moreover, the leading order of the small cost expansion is shown to depend only on the roughest part of the considered target. It therefore depends on the Hurst parameter. The third chapter is devoted to a numerical analysis of the utility loss studied in the second chapter. For this, we compare the utility loss in a rough volatility model to a semimartingale stochastic volatility model. The parameter values for both models are fitted to match frictionless utility for realistic values. By applying the result obtained in the second chapter of the thesis, the difference between leading order of utility loss can be explicitly compared.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available
Keywords: HG Finance ; QA Mathematics