Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.797824
Title: Executive dysfunction in hoarding disorder : a systematic literature review
Author: Gledhill, Lucinda
ISNI:       0000 0004 8505 4787
Awarding Body: King's College London
Current Institution: King's College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Hoarding Disorder (HD), conceptualised as difficulties with discarding possessions resulting in distress, the accumulation of items creating a cluttered, unusable environment, and significant impairment in functioning, is reported to affect 1.5% of adults. In addition, evidence suggests that those with HD experience further difficulties in executive functioning, including inhibition, attention, and decision-making. These deficits in executive function and other areas of information processing are thought to play a key role in maintaining HD. This review aimed to systematically review the evidence for executive dysfunction in this population when compared to healthy controls, focussing specifically on studies using clinician-delivered interviews to diagnose HD, and those using primary assessments of executive function. 12 studies were included in this review, and their data extracted. Results suggest consistent evidence for difficulties in sustained attention and inhibitory control, however literature on deficits in other areas of executive function is wide ranging with many contradictory findings. Further research is needed to investigate deficits in other areas of executive function in HD, endeavouring to use consistent methods to diagnose HD and measure executive function, which a lack of has to-date caused some of the problems in interpretation of true deficits.
Supervisor: Onwumere, Juliana ; Bream, Victoria Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.797824  DOI: Not available
Share: