Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.797314
Title: Exploring the role of religion in gendered-development policy and practice
Author: Elledge, Nora Khalaf
ISNI:       0000 0004 8503 417X
Awarding Body: Goldsmiths, University of London
Current Institution: Goldsmiths College (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Situated within post-colonial development critique and post-structural feminist theory, this PhD thesis explores the under-examined intersection of gender and religion in international development, focusing specifically on the gender analysis phase of bilateral donor projects. The research draws on qualitative evidence from an in-depth document analysis of development reporting and semi-structured interviews with managerial gender personnel and religion advisors from six large Western government aid agencies, eight of their recipient organisations, and nine local women's rights activists across different recipient countries. The findings suggest the need for an internal gender analysis that deconstructs complex power dynamics surrounding gendered issues related to religion, rather than a reliance on external religious partnerships which cater to development's preference of efficiency and political expedience but have gender regressive effects and perpetuate the notion of religion as a separate category. This thesis seeks to make three main academic contributions. First, it introduces a change in theorising the religion-gender nexus by situating it within the internal gender dimension of development rather than its external management of religious partnerships. Second, by inverting the conceptualisation of the nexus and by moving it away from a religion-in-the-field approach, this thesis shows that the nexus and the power structures it preserves are a global social construct rather than a unique feature of communities in developing countries. Third, it deconstructs binary developed vs. developing countries narratives and instead considers development issues on a continuous spectrum, while acknowledging that practitioners are part of the processes they study and dictate the power paradigms within which meaning is produced.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.797314  DOI:
Share: