Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.794910
Title: The economics of vehicle driving : a general equilibrium analysis in a dynamic two-period vintage model
Author: Ma, Xiaoxiao
ISNI:       0000 0004 8501 4953
Awarding Body: Durham University
Current Institution: Durham University
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
My thesis aims to explore the relationship between public policies and vehicle driving from three aspects. First, we examine two policy options for the government to address pollution externality caused by vehicle driving: gasoline taxes and clean vehicle subsidies towards clean technology. We introduce vintage vehicles into our model to measure the impact of policies on households' vehicle driving choices. We show that all policies are effective in reducing pollution and improving the environmental quality. However, they have distinctively different distributional impact on the production side and social welfare. Second, we derive the optimal environmental tax structure in the presence of externalities caused by vehicle driving in the first-best scenario. Analytical results show that the optimal gasoline taxes are composed of two opposing factors and depend on the household's preferences for environmental factors. Our calibration based on the U.S. economy shows that the optimal gasoline taxes should be higher for old cars while the optimal road taxes should be higher for new cars. Third, we formulate the optimal environmental tax structure in the presence of other distortionary taxes. We find that the optimal environmental taxes constitute both the efficiency part and the Pigovian part. Optimal taxes depend not only on the household's preferences for the environmental factors but also on the degree of complementarities with normal consumption goods.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.794910  DOI: Not available
Share: