Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.793597
Title: Theory and practice of gender transformative justice : the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Author: Demir, Ebru
ISNI:       0000 0004 8503 3628
Awarding Body: University of Sussex
Current Institution: University of Sussex
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis critically evaluates the extent to which the transitional justice process in Bosnia and Herzegovina has been gender transformative. Drawing upon conflict transformation and nascent transformative justice theories, the thesis suggests certain principles which should be used in order to remould the transitional justice mechanisms (trials, truth initiatives, reparations, and institutional reforms) for a gender transformative justice. The thesis offers two hypotheses. First, the thesis underlines the necessity of a gender transformative justice agenda in post-conflict reconstruction periods by claiming that only such an approach can challenge the reinforcement of patriarchal norms and traditional gender stereotypes in post- conflict societies. Second, the thesis suggests that the gender-neutral transitional justice process in Bosnia and Herzegovina still causes women's human rights violations today. The thesis finds that the transitional justice process has neglected many forms of gender-based violence in Bosnia and Herzegovina; these unaddressed and neglected acts of violence still continue today in different forms and to different extents. Gender transformative justice aims to address gender inequalities during post-conflict reconstruction periods and to address the continuum of violence against women. The thesis evaluates whether both international and domestic legal frameworks in Bosnia and Herzegovina comply with this aim. Alongside legal and doctrinal analysis, I conducted interviews with both elites (representatives of local and international NGOs, lawyers, legal scholars, politicians, psycho-therapists, and human rights activists) and survivors of wartime violence (genocide survivors and war-trauma survivors). The research finds that the transition period in Bosnia and Herzegovina has failed to provide gender justice. By illustrating the ways in which peace and justice are defined and conceptualised by the interviewees in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the thesis illustrates the disparity between women's own understandings of justice and 'the understanding of justice' provided under international and domestic law. Synthesizing John Paul Lederach's conflict transformation theory with transformative justice theory through a gendered lens, this research argues that transformative justice theory needs to be further developed to address gender and to challenge the exclusion of women and of women's understandings of peace and justice from the scope of international law
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.793597  DOI: Not available
Keywords: HQ1101 Women. Feminism ; JC0571 State and the individual. Human rights. Civil rights ; JC328.6 Violence. Political violence ; K Law
Share: