Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.792911
Title: Language in the age of algorithmic reproduction : a critique of linguistic capitalism
Author: Thornton, Philippa
ISNI:       0000 0004 8500 6574
Awarding Body: Royal Holloway, University of London
Current Institution: Royal Holloway, University of London
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Adopting the framework of Benjamin's 1936 essay 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction' (1999, 2008), and thinking through central themes of value, context and circulation, this thesis examines how language moves through digital space. Concentrating on Google's search and advertising platforms, the thesis explores the concept of 'linguistic capitalism' (Kaplan 2014), arguing that the ongoing effects on digitally mediated language are both linguistic and political. Indeed, the politics and power which lurk behind these technologies are often obscured, or normalised, by their ubiquity and aesthetics, a process which, following Benjamin, can perhaps only be exposed by the repoliticisation of language through art. Using poetry and classic texts such as Orwell's 'Nineteen Eighty-Four', as well as existing and experimental writing, the thesis harnesses the power of language and literature to critique and resist the technologies that exploit it in today's digital economy. Adopting what I am calling a post-digital (auto)ethnographic approach, the thesis offers an innovative new method in order to make visible the workings and effects of linguistic capitalism, using data gathered from Google AdWords for both quantitative and qualitative analysis, as well as introducing and documenting the development and reception of my own piece of 'political' art in the form of a critical creative intervention called {poem}.py.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.792911  DOI: Not available
Share: