Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.792286
Title: Do leadership theories explain the behaviours of nonprofit board members? : a contextual study of transformational leadership
Author: Bott, Gregory
ISNI:       0000 0004 8498 0076
Awarding Body: Royal Holloway, University of London
Current Institution: Royal Holloway, University of London
Date of Award: 2015
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Transformational leadership has been the dominant leadership theory of the past three decades. Research on leadership, and specifically transformational leadership, has been dominated by positivist, deductive, methodological approaches, which have been unable to sufficiently problematize the concept of leadership. Researchers therefore continue to enter the field with a presupposition heavily weighted toward leader agency and a topdown unidirectional focus. Such research is also insensitive to capturing a full appreciation for the context in which organizational actors perform. One underexamined context is that of the leadership process at the board-level, and especially in the nonprofit sector. Board members reside at the highest level of an organization, and are potentially distant from other organizational actors. Recognizing that leadership is a co-constructed, complex, and fluid process, alternative ontological positions are necessary in order to advance our current knowledge of the leadership process. I utilized inductively designed critical incident interviews in order to fully appreciate not only board member behaviours, but also potential alternative influences (e.g. contextual factors and organizational actors other than formal leaders). While remaining open to surprises in the empirical material, I explored behaviours and relationships, while analysing a specific context - the nonprofit board-executive director relationship. The results of this study suggest that in a governance context, hierarchical actors do not fit neatly into the boxes defined by 30 years of research on transformational leadership theory, suggesting that the leadership process is more complex than portrayed by current dichotomizations. The results also indicated that board members display select behaviours that are said to be part of transformational leadership theory, while other behaviours prescribed by current theory are not found to be repetitive in the empirical material. The findings of this study ultimately led me to conclude that leadership behaviours should be examined unconstrained by transformational leadership theory, allowing for an in-depth examination of the intricacies and relational processes of the leadership process.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.792286  DOI: Not available
Share: