Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.790439
Title: Mindfulness ability in people with mild to moderate dementia
Author: Bousfield, C. C.
ISNI:       0000 0004 8497 9534
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Overview This thesis focuses on research with people with dementia (PWD). Part 1 is a literature review exploring factors identified or endorsed by PWD and their carers as influencing whether or not the person with dementia would participate in research. A total of 16 papers were included. The quality of papers was variable, and limitations frequent. The most prominent motivators identified for research participation were direct health benefit and altruism. The most prominent barriers were concerns about risks and side effects of drugs and procedures, and the practical burden of participation. The discussion highlights key considerations for future recruitment. Part 2 is an empirical study examining the performance of 34 PWD on an experience-sampling measure of mindful attention. The study aimed to develop the evidence base for future mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for depression in dementia. No significant results were found for the main hypotheses, that people with dementia would perform significantly more poorly than a comparison group of older adults without dementia on the measure of mindful attention, and that performance on this measure would positively correlate with measures of executive function and overall cognition. Possible reasons for the findings are discussed, along with limitations of the study, and implications for future research and clinical practice. The comparison group data is shared with Habib (2016). The study is a substudy of an ongoing PhD project by Joshua Stott. Part 3 is a critical appraisal of the research process. It reflects on particular challenges that arose in the recruitment, consent and data collection processes with the PWD sample, outlining how these were dealt with during the study, and making recommendations for future research.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.790439  DOI: Not available
Share: