Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.788941
Title: Pelvic kinematics as confounding factor for cam hip impingement
Author: Hardijzer, Antoinette
ISNI:       0000 0004 8499 3803
Awarding Body: Imperial College London
Current Institution: Imperial College London
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The purpose of this thesis was to explore a range of biomechanical factors linked to the development of symptoms and potentially early onset hip OA in people with cam hip impingement. This was achieved through shape analysis on 3D bone models (segmented from medical images), and motion analysis performed during walking and squatting. Following ethical approval, kinematic and morphological variables were obtained from 19 pre-operative hip impingement patients and 18 healthy controls, and these were compared between groups. Patients demonstrated reduced neck-shaft-angles (-6.0°, p < .01) and increased anterior pelvic tilt during gait (+3.2°, p=.04) which are thought to predispose to impingement by decreasing the proximity between the cam and acetabular rim and making abutment more likely. The transverse pelvic plane is used to measure pelvic tilt during motion analysis, it is therefore interesting that the angle between the transverse and anterior pelvic plane is increased (+4.6°, p=.03) in patients, emphasising that the interplay between shape and function is a priority for further research. Avoidance of hip extension (-5.9°, p < .01) was also observed, which could be a compensatory mechanism to prevent further damages to the hip. Furthermore, large cams are thought to act as a mechanical constraint and limit rotation movement allowed within the acetabulum, as demonstrated by reduced peak hip internal rotation (during squat, -8.5°, p=.03). Controls were regrouped based on morphology to allow comparison between asymptomatic (CAM-; n=11) and symptomatic (CAM+, n=16) cams. Symptomatic cams have an increased width (+41.4°, p < .01), and start more superiorly (-29.4°, p < .01). Increased sagittal pelvic mobility (e.g. during a squat; -11.2° for CAM+, p < .01) is thought to be protective against hip impingement symptoms, as during high flexion angles the pelvic tilts backwards reducing the risk of abutment. These findings highlight the need to establish thresholds taking confounding factors into account.
Supervisor: McGregor, Alison ; Cobb, Justin Sponsor: Michael Uren Foundation
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.788941  DOI:
Share: