Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Questions of craft : making for the state in socialist Czechoslovakia
Author: Bell, Rebecca
ISNI:       0000 0004 7972 5564
Awarding Body: Royal College of Art
Current Institution: Royal College of Art
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 21 Jun 2022
Access from Institution:
Rather than having one official centralised definition, craft in Socialist Czechoslovakia should be understood in diverse and competing terms. Czechoslovak thinking and practice stemmed from a history of critical discourse around applied arts, including nineteenth-century concerns of national identity and interwar investigations of craft and modernity. In the Socialist context, these historic strands continued via the interests of individuals who had been active before the Second World War alongside younger members of the art and design community. Terminology, theory and practice had to be negotiated within shifting ideological parameters. Craft grappled with the requirements of Socialist Realism and Socialist Modernism. State organisations such as ÚLUV (Ústředí lidové a umĕlecké výroby, the Centre for Folk and Art Production), ÚUŘ (Ústředí uměleckých řemesel, Centre for Artistic Crafts), and ÚBOK (Ústav bytové a oděvní kultury, the Institute of Housing and Fashion Culture) led the official discussion around craftthrough publications, conferences, exhibitions and projects. Studios and factories were encompassed in these organisations and their work was presented in magazines like Tvar (Shape), Umění a řemesla (Arts and Crafts), and Domov (Home). Such publications demonstrated a constant negotiation of terms that took into account Soviet models, international influences and parallel movements in literature, art, and philosophy. Points of tension tell us a great deal about the role of craft in Socialist Czechoslovakia. Techniques were devised by the individual maker in order to offer a commentary on the socialist condition. Integral to this was a frequent departure to the absurd; using humour, whimsy and Švejkism (Kosík, 1963) to respond to a bureaucratic environment. Through a range of case studies, I demonstrate key moments in this ongoing dialogue, including Czech New Wave cinema, animation, magazines, show flats, publications, textiles and glass figurines. This thesis proposes that craft practices in Socialist Czechoslovakia embraced a range of tactics in order to provide contexts for debate, considering questions of craft in a politically controlled environment. Relationships to traditional folk methods and motifs, as well as modernist approaches, resulted in a series of tactics that referenced or quoted, adapted, or rejected certain ideological, national and international interests. The resulting spectrums of value upon which objects were placed included craft to industry; kitsch to modern; authentic to false; capitalist to socialist; and moral to economic. The characteristics of craft were often positioned alongside or against folk practices as well as more scientific and didactic approaches such as ergonomics in the home. The values of craft were explored in relationship to territories of design. The Socialist Modern can be defined according to these multi-faceted terms. Important Anglo-American publications have focused on Czech art glass (Petrova: 2001; Ricke: 2005). But less chartered territories are smaller scale works in textiles, glass and ceramics. These were also often positioned alongside and in relation to industrial objects and ventures into architecture, furniture and interiors, in publications of the time. Current Czech projects are beginning to address these areas (Hubatová-Vacková, Pachmanová, Pečínková: 2015; Bartlová, Vybíral et al: 2015), yet there is comparatively little in English. Additionally, the discomfort of approaching Socialist Realism and the Socialist agenda in Czech scholarship remains, alongside a reliance on temporal divisions of objects according to accepted delineation of time periods (e.g. Socialist Realism, Normalisation). My research sets out to cross these historical, linguistic and temporal boundaries. I follow in the footsteps of Soviet specialists (Svetlana Boym: 1994; David Crowley and Jane Pavitt: 1998 and 2008; Deema Kaneff: 2004; Juliet Kinchin: 2009; Nicolette Makovicky: 2009; and Greg Castillo: 2010). I hope to add to their scholarship by bringing Czechoslovakia and its complex definitions of craft further into the foreground.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available
Keywords: V220 European History ; W700 Crafts