Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.787328
Title: Political liberalism and epistemic permissivism
Author: Anantharaman, Muralidharan
ISNI:       0000 0004 7972 4481
Awarding Body: University of Warwick
Current Institution: University of Warwick
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The supposed fact of reasonable disagreement plays a crucial role in standard accounts of political liberalism. The standard account posits reasonable disagreement as arising primarily from the supposed fact that, in at least some circumstances, people can permissibly respond in different ways to the same evidence. That is to say, the standard account presupposes permissivism: It is possible that more than one doxastic attitude towards a proposition is rationally permissible, given a body of evidence. In this thesis, I shall show that the standard account is mistaken in presupposing permissivism by arguing for Uniqueness: Given a total body of evidence at most one doxastic attitude is rationally permissible. I shall argue for this by first rehearsing White's two objections to permissivism and showing that, at the very least, they show that an intrapersonal version of Uniqueness is true. That is to say, at most one doxastic attitude is justified for a given agent given a total body of evidence. I shall then present different accounts of permissivism consistent with intrapersonal uniqueness and show that none of these accounts are successful. If my argument is successful, the standard account of political liberalism may have to be revised.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.787328  DOI: Not available
Keywords: B Philosophy (General)
Share: