Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: | https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.785464 |
![]() |
|||||||
Title: | Homophily : the antithesis of corporate board diversity in the United Kingdom | ||||||
Author: | Richardson, Wendyann |
ISNI:
0000 0004 7970 9767
|
|||||
Awarding Body: | Loughborough University | ||||||
Current Institution: | Loughborough University | ||||||
Date of Award: | 2018 | ||||||
Availability of Full Text: |
|
||||||
Abstract: | |||||||
The focus of this study is on the corporate governance aspect of board composition in the United Kingdom (UK). The corporate board has received great attention world wide as some scholars and stakeholders call for board diversity. This has led to attempts to rationalise the reasoning behind the large number of homogeneous boards; despite numerous pressures exerted on firms to diversify. Several studies on board composition have employed agency theory or resource dependency theory as theoretical lenses. In contrast, this study utilises homophily theory, a theoretical approach that derives from the sociology discipline.
|
|||||||
Supervisor: | Not available | Sponsor: | Not available | ||||
Qualification Name: | Thesis (Ph.D.) | Qualification Level: | Doctoral | ||||
EThOS ID: | uk.bl.ethos.785464 | DOI: | Not available | ||||
Keywords: | Business and Management not elsewhere classified ; Homophily ; Corporate board ; Diversity ; Antithesis | ||||||
Share: |