Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Evolution of the avian skull : evolutionary drivers of modern bird diversity
Author: Navalon, Guillermo
ISNI:       0000 0004 7968 2429
Awarding Body: University of Bristol
Current Institution: University of Bristol
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Encompassing more than 11,000 species, birds are the most speciose group of tetrapods in modern-world ecosystems. The modern radiation of birds (Neornithes) originated in the Mesozoic and greatly radiated in disparity following the K-Pg extinction, a radiation which is often believed to have been primarily driven by adaptation in response to ecological opportunity after this biotic crisis. This assumption largely rests on the presumption that the anatomy in birds, particularly the large variety of beak forms, is very correlated with their ecologies, particularly feeding ecology. In this thesis, this presumption is tested in a broad macroevolutionary scale for the first time. I find that this relationship is weaker and more complex than often assumed, suggesting that the diversification of beak morphologies in birds was likely shaped by a more complex set of evolutionary drivers than feeding adaptation, likely involving both extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Consequently, the roles of other intrinsic factors in craniofacial evolution are explored within some selected lineages of modern birds. First, I explore the patterns and strength of the coevolution between the beak and the rest of the skull (cranial integration), across all the lineages of landbirds (Inopinaves) and how these associations affected their craniofacial macroevolution. I find that variations in cranial integration had important implications for cranial evolution, specifically for the two classic avian adaptive radiations: Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers. Secondly, I explore craniofacial shape variation over evolution and development in Strisores. My results suggest that evolutionary changes in development played a significant role in shaping macroevolution in this clade of birds. Finally, over this thesis geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods are extensively used. I show some current limitations of these methods concerning the quantification of covariation patterns (integration and modularity). I propose a pipeline for identifying potential issues and offer some preliminary novel solutions to overcome them.
Supervisor: Rayfield, Emily Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available
Keywords: birds ; macroevolution ; shape ; skull ; geometric morphometrics ; adaptation ; constraint ; integration ; phylogenetic comparative methods ; development