Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.782479
Title: Trait inattention and goal representations
Author: Arabaci, Gizem
ISNI:       0000 0004 7968 0845
Awarding Body: Bournemouth University
Current Institution: Bournemouth University
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 Sep 2021
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Inattention is a symptom of many clinical disorders. Research has shown that the symptom of inattention is best thought of as being on a continuum. Consistently, sub- clinical inattention has been shown to be related to impairments in working memory, particularly those functions related to goal maintenance. In six studies, the link between trait inattention and working memory limitations was investigated with the aim of differentiating inattention from hyperactivity and impulsivity, which are commonly comorbid with inattention in ADHD. Across two studies, it was found that trait inattention predicted the daily life reports of mind wandering. However, this relationship was also observed in hyperactive and impulsive traits. Unique relationships were however observed between trait inattention and goal neglect (as measured by a letter-monitoring task). Furthermore, it was found that inattentive traits uniquely predicted decreased performance on task switching and Stroop tasks where the use of goal maintenance (proactive control) would be beneficial to task performance; and goal neglect mediated these relationships. I discuss how these findings relate to the inattention, goal neglect and proactive control literatures. The key finding was the consistent replication of the unique link between inattention and goal neglect frequency (Chapter 3, Chapter 5), and the role that goal neglect plays in producing impairments in proactive control use.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.782479  DOI: Not available
Share: