Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.781906
Title: The sum of all corruption : a ground theory of corruption perceptions
Author: Stiernstedt, Peter
ISNI:       0000 0004 7967 519X
Awarding Body: University of Portsmouth
Current Institution: University of Portsmouth
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Abstract:
Of all the issues faced by society, corruption is one of the most difficult to properly address. Corruption is also a phenomenon that most people have an intuitive idea and a subjective opinion about. Whether or not that opinion is commonly shared is another question. This research asks: how can perceptions of corruption inform our understanding of the behaviour associated with corruption and how does this translate into effective anti- corruption strategies? By presenting a grounded theory that underpins human behaviour classified as 'corrupt', the research strives to increase our understanding of corruption. Corrupt behaviour is conditioned by an understanding of an action as being deviant, i.e. illegal or immoral. Consequently, increasing the understanding of corruption makes it easier to combat. Reflecting the ambition to reach a high level of abstraction, the method used is Grounded Theory, modified with a unique system for treating literature. The method is applied within an ontologically relativistic and epistemologically constructivist paradigm. The scientific contribution of this research is a unique methodology providing an original contribution to knowledge in the form of the self-interest utility maximisation theory, a creative contribution via the 'at-least-level' assumption and an innovative contribution through the application of the findings to a situational crime prevention matrix. The self-interest utility maximisation theory is based on the premise that motivation is latent, and that corruption is the product of a degenerated decision-making process. Given that an opportunity is perceived as advantageous and that it can be rationalised or neutralised, corruption may be a rational choice. With opportunity identified as a central driver for corruption, the source of motivation is hypothetically explained by gaining an advantage 'at least-level', i.e. the action causing the smallest cognitive dissonance which can be rationalised and neutralised while at the same time providing the largest advantage. Situational crime prevention, which in its simplest form can be seen as synonymous with opportunity reduction, is presented as a framework for anti- corruption measures. It is recognised that an application of the self-interest utility maximisation theory through situational crime prevention for anti-corruption purposes requires further empirical research and real world testing. The findings indicate that, given the latent nature of motivation and its susceptibility to rationalisation by neutralisation, the next element necessary for deviant behaviour in the form of corruption is opportunity. Regardless of motivation, and irrespective of ability to rationalise and neutralise - an agent must be presented with an opportunity. Corruption is a crime above all where effective prevention is regulated primarily by controlling and reducing opportunity.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.781906  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Criminology
Share: