Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.780572
Title: The construction and validation of the Primary Scientific Reasoning Test
Author: Diana, Ng Yee Ping
ISNI:       0000 0004 7966 2137
Awarding Body: University of Oxford
Current Institution: University of Oxford
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
A major task of science education is to foster scientific reasoning. Despite extensive research, it is still unclear how best to assess this cognitive proficiency; a limited consensus of its nature has arguably constrained the development of classroom assessments of scientific reasoning. Therefore, this research aimed to develop a valid and reliable test of scientific reasoning - the Primary Scientific Reasoning Test (PSRT) - for primary-aged pupils. Developments in science education, as well as emerging and novel insights across substantive literature, formed the theoretical framework underlying the PSRT. A mixed methodology was used to develop and validate the PSRT over four phases. The first phase developed the theoretical framework and the draft items. In the next phase, an 18-member expert panel from Singapore and England evaluated and endorsed the conceptual validity of the construct and the content validity of the draft items. The third phase field-tested and refined the draft instrument with 138 Year 7 pupils from four Singapore secondary schools. In the fourth and last phase, 431 Year 6 pupils from six Singapore primary schools attempted the finalised 100-item PSRT. Results from psychometric analysis using Rasch modelling supported inferences of a unidimensional construct underlying the test, and examination of the item difficulty estimates produced evidence that the order of difficulties generally accorded with the framework of scientific reasoning. Given that the explanatory concepts in the framework generally explained the pupils' performance and drawing on the strength and scope of other evidence, the thesis concludes that the PSRT displayed reasonably strong construct validity. This conclusion supports the use of PSRT as a valid and reliable measure of scientific reasoning for primary-aged pupils. The theoretical basis of the PSRT and its construction procedures also bear lessons for test developers and researchers. Overall, the study contributes clarification and understanding about the nature and assessment of scientific reasoning, particularly for primary-aged pupils.
Supervisor: Baird, Jo-Anne ; McGrane, Joshua Sponsor: Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.780572  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Test of Scientific Reasoning ; Scientific Reasoning ; Construct Validation ; Scientific Thinking ; Primary School Science
Share: