Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.779979
Title: Little wars : the geopolitics of 20th century board games
Author: Harby, Alexander
ISNI:       0000 0004 7965 6706
Awarding Body: University of Nottingham
Current Institution: University of Nottingham
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Political and cultural geographers are increasingly engaging with the political aspects of play. This "ludic geopolitics" is often studied through video games, particularly war games which place the player in virtual battlefields and reproduce geopolitical discourses. But this work is ahistorical; it has overlooked the contributions that board games over the 20th century have made to shaping and reproducing popular geopolitics. In this thesis, I reveal these contributions by analysing twenty British war games produced in the early 20th century, from the Second Boer War to the Second World War. I discuss their visual contents and forms, the ways in which their rules function, and their historical contexts to show how they circulate popular geopolitics and discourses of militarism in response to Britain's ever-changing geopolitical climate. Recurring tropes engage in these board games that historicise modern ludic geopolitical work on video games. These games engage with British popular geopolitics in various ways, by reproducing wartime propaganda, simulating past conflicts, or even making their geopolitical contexts deliberately absent in the game's contents. But even when war games are ambivalent, they circulate similar popular discourses of militarism, demonstrating technofetishism and representing wars as bloodless and as inherently masculine.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.779979  DOI: Not available
Keywords: GV Recreation. Leisure
Share: