Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.779408
Title: Productivity and wellbeing in the 21st century workplace : implications of choice
Author: Hanc, Madalina-Luiza
ISNI:       0000 0004 7965 1040
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The shift from industrial production to a knowledge-based economy in Western countries and internationally emphasises the growing importance of knowledge workers, i.e. highly-skilled professionals. Their productivity and wellbeing may be essential for maintaining organisational success and national prosperity. However, the role played by the workspace in achieving these outcomes is not fully established. A gap of knowledge exists between the environmental and social sciences approaches to workspace productivity and wellbeing. The environmental sciences perspective emphasizes the role of the physical 'workspace' environment on productivity and wellbeing. In contrast, the social sciences approach focuses on the psychosocial processes in the 'workplace'. Considering the physical and psychosocial determinants as independent from each other leads to an incomplete understanding of workspace productivity and wellbeing. A global shift towards flexible working styles highlights the necessity to explore both perspectives. Aided by the development of digital work technologies, a growing number of employees are becoming able to work anytime, anywhere. This maximises the role of personal choice of space and time of work on productivity and wellbeing and may require re-examination of the role played by the physical workspace environment. The research aims to understand both environmental and social sciences perspectives on workplace outcomes of productivity and wellbeing, particularly focussing on 'knowledge' work conducted in office buildings and other locations. It explores the relationship between personal choice over the space and time of work, and the quality of the physical office environment, on two outcomes: productivity and wellbeing. The methodology adopted for this 'WorQ', Workspace Quality and Choice study, includes a novel tool to measure productivity using a proxy: cognitive learning. It applies the established Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and adopts the ecological momentary assessment approach. The methodology uses short digital questionnaires and a smartphone-based cognitive testing application to assess the short- and medium-term effects of physical and psychosocial factors in the workspace. The results show statistically significant associations with wellbeing: participants with higher levels of choice of work space and time reported higher levels of wellbeing. No clear patterns were found regarding the relationship between choice of work space and time and cognitive learning, but choice of time alone was suggested to have a potentially positive impact on learning. The practical implications of the findings for workplace management are addressed, as is the further development of research to better understand the interactions of personal choice and the design of physical work environments.
Supervisor: Marmot, A. ; Mavrogianni, A. Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.779408  DOI: Not available
Share: