Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Accountability of quality and fair access in Indonesian higher education : policymaker and practitioner perspectives
Author: Brewis, Linda Elisa Jennifer
ISNI:       0000 0004 7964 9661
Awarding Body: UCL (University College London)
Current Institution: University College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Indonesia's post-1998 higher education reforms have used accountability as a policy tool to regulate educational quality and fair access for low-income and disadvantaged students. This is done via curricular standardisation, accreditation, means-tested tuition fees and scholarship schemes. This thesis is an exploratory, qualitative inquiry into what accountability means for contemporary policymakers and higher education practitioners. Policymaker assumptions about these accountability mechanisms were investigated through unstructured interviews with 10 government representatives (ministry of research, technology and higher education, accreditation bodies). The findings reveal that human capital and neoliberal rationales are accepted to an extent, although social justice rationales are also called upon to intervene in the higher education market in the name of public accountability. Policymakers are also shifting toward a professional accountability model where professional associations play a stronger role in assuring quality. Practitioner beliefs and practices were investigated via three institutional case studies in West Java which represented a variety of subject orientations (IT, health science, science and humanities) and student demographics (low-income status, rural versus urban origin). Data was collected via 45 semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of staff drawn from four job role categories (senior management, middle management, lecturers, admissions/recruitment staff), 13 classroom observations, and analysis of institutional documents and statistics. Evidently, staff are driven by external pressures (state, labour market), internal pressures (institutional mission, peer accountability and self-accountability) as well as discipline-derived pressures (e.g. an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach, liberal arts values). The practitioner perspective highlighted how quality and fair access often overlap, with staff defining quality in response to the needs of their student backgrounds (low-income, rural, low-ability). Internal accountability pressures were equally important to external ones for driving beliefs and practices in teaching quality. Internal accountability was especially important for implementing supportive pedagogical and financial strategies to aid student retention and well-being.
Supervisor: Schendel, R. ; Marginson, S. Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available