Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.778989
Title: Empirical analysis of geographical indications in France and Vietnam : opportunities and constraints
Author: Pick, Barbara
ISNI:       0000 0004 7964 6911
Awarding Body: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Current Institution: London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London)
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Looking beyond formal legal protection for geographical indications (GIs), this research project empirically explores the opportunities and constraints which influence whether regional product branding initiatives are successful. The legal protection of GIs is characterised by a variety of legal approaches which translates the many meanings and objectives attached to them. These range from protection of the consumers and producers' interests against unfair competition practices, to territorial development, to preservation of cultural heritage and natural resources. This research seeks to understand the relationships between the type of legal protection, the operation of GI initiatives, their economic and non-economic effects, and the opportunities and constraints that affect such effects. To this aim, it draws upon empirical data collected from twelve GI initiatives involving different means of protection (trade mark and sui generis systems) in France and Vietnam that both associate GIs with economic and non-economic objectives. In doing so, this thesis identifies the factors that impact on the collective dynamics involved in the GI initiatives; those that influence the use and value of GIs on the market; those that hinder their use on the market; and those that contribute to the ability of GIs to create effects outside the market. This thesis argues that the significance of the distinction between the two types of legal protection varies greatly depending on the institutional context in which the GI initiatives are embedded and that the differences between the sui generis and trade mark approaches can be reduced in practice. Further, the type of legal protection is often not enough to bring about economic and non-economic effects. This research suggests that a wide range of organisational, institutional, marketing, socio-economic and cultural factors influence both the use and value of GIs, and the benefits derived from them.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.778989  DOI: Not available
Keywords: K Law (General)
Share: