Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.778740
Title: Participatory development and therapeutic governance : an immanent critique of the anticipated consequences of REFLECT circle participation on the development subject
Author: Shilton, Louisa Jane
ISNI:       0000 0004 7964 4684
Awarding Body: University of Sheffield
Current Institution: University of Sheffield
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The thesis draws upon an interest in participation as a development concept in order to explore the extent to which a prevailing Western social-cultural interest in the emotional and psychological aspects of life has begun to manifest itself within development policy and practice. It draws on critical theory, using the philosophical-hermeneutic method of immanent critique, to scrutinise the existence of subtle ambitions to improve the poor's psychological capital through induced participatory development practice using one specific community-based approach to participatory development known as REFLECT (Regenerated Freirian Literacy through Community Empowerment Techniques) as its illustrative case study. The thesis solely engages with REFLECT as an epistemic body of knowledge and focuses on identified tensions and contradictions within its prevailing knowledge claims to unpick and appraise what it might be trying to achieve when it talks about increasing participants' confidence and self-esteem along with enhancing their political empowerment. More specifically, it draws upon insights from Vanessa Pupavac's work on development's perceived therapeutic turn, together with critical psychological and sociological literatures, to ask whether and to what extent REFLECT might represent a form of therapeutic governance when its vision of the empowered development subject is expressed in a mixture of political and psychological terms. It subsequently uses this overarching research question to make an overall statement about the creeping psychologisation of the development subject and what expectations a growing interest in the emotional and psychological aspects of life within development policy and practice might bring to bear upon that development subject.
Supervisor: Harrison, Graham Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.778740  DOI: Not available
Share: