Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.778638
Title: Modular and extra-modular second language knowledge of unaccusativity and unergativity by Najdi Arabic L2 learners of English
Author: Al Khalaf, Maha Abdullah H.
ISNI:       0000 0004 7964 3665
Awarding Body: University of Leeds
Current Institution: University of Leeds
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 Jul 2024
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The existence of two types of second language knowledge, namely acquired and learned, implicit and explicit (or more accurately, modular and extra-modular second-language knowledge) has long been accepted by different theories within the field of second language acquisition. However, this consensus is hampered in part by a lack of empirical evidence of how each type of second language might manifest itself in the production and comprehension of the second-language learner. Adopting the Modular Cognitive Framework (Truscott & Sharwood Smith, 2004a; 2004b), this thesis aims to establish a detailed account of the nature of development of the two types of knowledge; how different input experiences stimulate the development of different types of L2 knowledge. The thesis also aims to explore how L1 cross-linguistic influence would fade with more frequent encounters with L2. The linguistic constructions tested are unaccusative and unergative verbs. The basis of choosing the linguistic constructions is the L2 English classroom practice of oversimplifying the notion of intransitivity and avoiding explicit teaching of syntactic and semantic aspects of the unaccusative and its argument. The study incorporates two empirical tasks measuring L2 comprehension and production: a reaction-time reading comprehension task, comparing Najdi Arabic L2 English learners' response time to sentences with unaccusative verbs compared to response time to sentences with unergative verbs and an error-correction and rule-verbalisation task comparing Najdi Arabic learners' ability to correct ungrammatical sentences with unaccusative verbs compared to correcting ungrammatical sentences with unergative verbs. Findings from the current experimental study support what the Competing Systems Hypothesis (Rothman, 2008) seems to suggest: while L2 production could be guided by both modular as well as extra-modular L2 knowledge, L2 comprehension could only be guided by modular L2 knowledge.
Supervisor: Whong, Melinda Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.778638  DOI: Not available
Share: