Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.778372
Title: Analysing determinants of illness in populations : development of a conceptual framework linked to a sequence of related empirical studies
Author: Levene, Louis S.
ISNI:       0000 0004 7964 1061
Awarding Body: University of Leicester
Current Institution: University of Leicester
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Background: Conceptual frameworks can help researchers and services by characterising disparities in health needs and outcomes between populations, and how these are affected by risk and non-disease factors. As no published conceptual frameworks fully fitted my research needs, I developed a new framework in conjunction with a series of observational studies. Research questions: Does a new conceptual framework for population health research help to: 1. Generate testable hypotheses 2. Establish useful sets of relevant variables for inclusion in analyses 3. Describe relationships between these variables? The framework's configuration The framework has two components: 1. An illness pathway with three variable groups: illness determinants, health needs, and health outcomes. 2. Two variable groups acting as modifiers of the illness pathway: context (factors not generating illness but describing the settings in which populations live) and interventions. Observational studies: Using the framework, five population studies resulted in seven publications, which: 1. Described how both non-disease variables and clinical performance variables predict variations and persistent disparities in mortality rates between population groups in England 2. Demonstrated that current allocations of practice funding may insufficiently support general practices serving very deprived populations with greater health needs 3. Described the pervasive widespread decline of continuity of care, reflecting general practices' struggles to provide adequate patient access. Conclusions: The framework supported my research and has service utility. The publications have contributed to knowledge and are relevant to current debates about addressing health inequalities and worsening access to primary care. These studies demonstrate my suitability to undertake research.
Supervisor: Khunti, Kamlesh Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.778372  DOI: Not available
Share: