Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.778192
Title: Redefining universal development from and at the margins : Indian Economics' contribution to development discourse, 1870-1905
Author: Bach, Maria Viktoria Sara Britta
ISNI:       0000 0004 7963 9287
Awarding Body: King's College London
Current Institution: King's College London (University of London)
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Late 19th century Indian Economics redefined development. This thesis examines what shaped the idea of development in Indian Economics from 1870 to 1905, using discourse analysis to explore the interaction between and effect of the multidiscursive and multispatial contexts. Although recent International Political Economy scholarship has started to encourage a global perspective, historical research in the field is still centred on European and American contributions. The research aims to fill that gap by analysing Indian Economics development discourse that emerged in a period of political conflict and poor socio-economic conditions which brought into question the legitimacy of British imperial rule. Indian Economics subsequently attempted to prove India's ability to progress and conceptualise an appropriate and effective development plan. Additionally, the research complements recent research in social history and history of political and economic thought that attempts to contextualise Indian intellectuals' conceptualisation of nationalism at the turn of the 19th century. I show how the position of Indian Economics at the margins of discursive space offered a unique perspective that enabled Indian Economics to discursively innovate at the margins of development discourse. The analysis concludes that Indian Economics redefined the concept of universality in the existing idea of development in the 19th century by rejecting the widely accepted international division of labour and the dominant assertion that progress originated in Europe. India, according to Indian Economics, could and should industrialise like all other nations, because the idea of universal development in Indian Economics adopted a world view that saw universal progress or positive societal change as beneficial to all, rather than a zero-sum game involving necessary winners and losers.
Supervisor: Muzaka, Valbona ; Wilson, Jon Edward ; Callinicos, Alexander Theodore Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.778192  DOI: Not available
Share: