Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.775620
Title: The relationship between rationality and reasoning in rational choice and behavioural economics
Author: Staras, Antonios
ISNI:       0000 0004 7962 7956
Awarding Body: University of East Anglia
Current Institution: University of East Anglia
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
In normative economics and behavioural social sciences, rationality is described as a set of rationality axioms on preferences. A common explanatory strategy is to attribute deviations from standard decision theory axioms to 'reasoning errors' using the dual-system model. The main idea is that reasoning errors are often sourced in the fast and automatic System 1 and that the logical System 2 has the capacity to correct these errors. Very little effort has been made to explain what this logical reasoning is, what are its 'limitations', and how it leads to preferences that satisfy these axioms. My thesis explores the relevance of John Broome's (2013) philosophical argument for normative and behavioural economics that the notion of 'reasoning' is separate from that of 'rationality'. I propose a simple 'Broomean' model of reasoning as a conscious, explicit, and rule-guided mental process - what cognitive scientists and behavioural economists call System 2 - and investigate the extent to which rational preferences can or cannot be reached by this type of reasoning. Chapters 1 and 2 develop the formal framework that allows us to capture and disentangle the notions of reasoning and rationality. Chapter 2 concludes that reasoning is successful in achieving some but not all requirements of the theory. One implication of this is that automatic processes jump in where reasoning fails to lead to rational preferences. Chapter 3 uses this framework to discuss general problems and famous paradoxes to expected utility theory in decision theory and behavioural economics.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.775620  DOI: Not available
Share: