Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.775330
Title: Is Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights a continuation of the Protestant theology?
Author: Toro, Dareen
ISNI:       0000 0004 7962 5061
Awarding Body: Queen Mary, University of London
Current Institution: Queen Mary, University of London
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
In this thesis it is asked whether Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is a continuation of the Protestant theology. It is demonstrated that despite the on-going process of secularisation, Protestant religious frameworks are still embedded within Western legal systems in general and the ECHR in particular. Taking this into account, a new explanation regarding the interpretation and application of Article 9 is put forward. It is explained how religious freedom came to be one of the central claims within Christian Protestant theology in association with linked ideas such as secularism. When freedom of religion is situated within European intellectual history, the "two kingdoms" of Luther, the private realm of the conscience and the public realm of the (sinful) body, are clearly reflected in the wording of Article 9 ECHR. Since the wording, as well as the judicial interpretations and applications of Article 9 ECHR, are biased in favour of the Christian Protestant view, this is automatically discriminatory against applicants who do not have a Protestant background, and even more biased against those of non-Abrahamic traditions. It is demonstrated that applicants from a non-Protestant faith or tradition attempting to utilise Article 9 EHCR have to distort their claims to fit within the confines of Article 9. This bias is made worse by the interpretation and application of Article 9 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). In the light of these conclusions, a fresh analysis is made of the ECtHR judgments on Article 9 illustrating the continuation of a post-Reformation struggle for iconoclasm, fought over through the secularised language of modern law. This analysis includes: applications brought by those from non-Abrahamic traditions, other Christians and other Abrahamic religions; judgments concerning Muslims, mainly the wearing of the hijab (headscarf);1 and the response of the ECtHR to curbs on proselytisation and idolatry in some countries of the Council of Europe.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.775330  DOI: Not available
Keywords: European Convention on Human Rights ; ECHR ; theology ; Protestantism ; religious freedom
Share: