Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.775256
Title: Recasting credit rating agencies' responsibility : suggestions for reform
Author: Miglionico, Andrea
ISNI:       0000 0004 7962 4333
Awarding Body: Queen Mary, University of London
Current Institution: Queen Mary, University of London
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
The credit rating agencies (CRAs) have become major players in the financial markets yet their reputations have been tarnished by certain assessments issued during the 2007-2009 financial crisis. There is therefore a clear need to regulate the practice of the highly influential, though at times inaccurate, ratings of these agencies. The overriding proposition is that CRAs should be liable for the issuance of inaccurate ratings. The analysis maps the contours of the legal aspects of the credit ratings market before addressing the major questions regarding a CRA's modus operandi. It is argued that CRAs are capable of bringing about potential distortions in the financial sector, thereby resulting in a reduction in market confidence which, in turn, influences negotiations and expectations. In this regard, a civil liability regime for CRAs could constitute a system of investor protection over and above traditional regulation. The purpose of this thesis is to demonstrate that the present system for regulating CRAs in the US, the UK and the EU is defective in terms of information asymmetries, an absence of transparency, conflicts of interest and limited competition. The thesis considers whether an effective liability regime through the 'estoppel rule' could be a valid option in the case of CRAs. In this light, the thesis attempts to demonstrate that CRAs should be regulated having due regard to their potential systemic threat. Further, the thesis suggests that CRAs should be subject to professional standards similar to those applicable to other information intermediaries such as auditors and financial analysts. The idea is that CRAs should be made responsible for their investment certification because of their fundamental role in the evaluation of credit risk and their influence on confidence and decisions in the market. The research brings forth a range of recommendations aimed at reforming the current regulatory framework.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.775256  DOI: Not available
Keywords: Law ; credit rating agencies ; regulation ; evaluation
Share: