Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.775032
Title: Unpacking product modularity innovation in R&D teams
Author: Martinez-Martin, Daniel
ISNI:       0000 0004 7962 2303
Awarding Body: City, University of London
Current Institution: City, University of London
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Does modularity stimulate innovation or, on the other side, are these modules and standards limiting engineers and hindering innovative activities? Innovation is a crucial factor for the long-term survival of any organization. In order to reduce complexity, organizations introduce product modularity as one essential strategy for R&D. Modularity is extensively applied in the research of technology and organizations. However, collaboration in R&D teams working with product modularity is somewhat paradoxical, as it requires autonomy, on one hand, working and keeping modules separate in design, and yet interdependent on the other hand, as teams need to be participative in the integrative process of bringing different modules together. Building on the insight that product modularity can have contradictory effects on innovation, this dissertation is centered on the influences of product modularity on innovation under the specific R&D team context. Essentially, this study unpacks the understanding of the concept of product modularity by establishing the two essential dimensions of product modularity (i.e., module standardization and reconfiguration) and studying the effects on innovation. In addition, this work enhances the understanding of the concept of alignment between task and organizational structure and provides evidence of the impact of this alignment on innovation. Moreover, this study aims to resolve the prevailing poor fit between innovation practice and theory by adopting, empirically, effectiveness and efficiency views of innovation. A sample from 140 R&D teams from a large organization in the automotive industry was analyzed and multiple additional data triangulations and robustness checks were conducted. The findings reveal that organizations must carefully consider the different, even opposite effects of standardization and reconfiguration on innovation and find an optimum balance. In particular, it is crucial to understand what areas of the product and organization, managers need to pay particular attention to cope with the impact of misalignments, identifying critical design interfaces, ensure the most effective team setting and promote innovation.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.775032  DOI: Not available
Keywords: HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Share: