Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.774622
Title: Early Greek indexicality : markers of allusion in archaic Greek poetry
Author: Nelson, Thomas James
ISNI:       0000 0004 7961 8259
Awarding Body: University of Cambridge
Current Institution: University of Cambridge
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis is concerned with early Greek literary history and the nature of archaic Greek allusion. It examines how our earliest Greek poets self-consciously marked and signalled their interactions with other texts and traditions, often in a deeply antagonistic fashion. In recent years, scholars have explored how Roman poets signposted references to their predecessors through a range of relational metaphors, representing their allusions as acts of recollection, echo and theft. Yet although these readings have proved a popular and rewarding interpretative approach, such allusive phenomena are often assumed to be the preserve of the scholarly, literate and bookish climates of the Hellenistic and Roman worlds. In this study, by contrast, I highlight how these very same devices can already be detected in Archaic Greek Poetry, from Homer to Pindar, challenging any simple dichotomy between the orality of Archaic Greece and the literacy of Hellenistic Rome. After an introduction in which I lay out the objectives of my study and address the methodological difficulties of discussing allusion and intertextuality in early Greek poetry, the majority of the thesis is divided into three main sections, each of which addresses a different 'index' (marker/pointer) of allusion in archaic Greek epic and lyric. The first addresses what Latinists call the 'Alexandrian footnote': vague references to hearsay and anonymous tradition which frequently conceal specific nods to precise literary predecessors. The second focuses on poetic memory, exploring how characters' reminiscences of events from their fictional pasts coincide with recollections of earlier literary texts and traditions. The final chapter turns to time and temporality, to explore how Greek poets both evoke and pointedly replay episodes of the literary past or future beyond their immediate narrative. Together, these three case studies demonstrate that the indexing and signposting of allusions was nothing new by the time of the Hellenistic age. What are sometimes considered distinctively learned flourishes of self-consciousness were in fact, I contend, an integral part of the literary tradition from the very start, a key feature of the grammar of allusion with which ancient audiences were already intuitively familiar.
Supervisor: Hunter, Richard ; Whitmarsh, Tim Sponsor: AHRC
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.774622  DOI:
Keywords: Classics ; Intertextuality ; Allusion ; Indexicality ; Markers of Allusion ; Alexandrian footnote ; Poetic Memory ; Homer ; Hesiod ; Pindar ; Sappho ; Greek Epic ; Greek Lyric ; Archilochus ; Bacchylides ; Mimnermus ; Homeric Hymns ; Epic Cycle ; Neoanalysis ; Stesichorus ; Iambus ; Elegy ; Tyrtaeus ; Archaic Greek Poetry ; Alcaeus ; Theognis ; Iliad ; Odyssey ; Xenophanes ; Anacreon ; Skolia ; Ibycus ; Catalogue of Women ; Gilgamesh ; Near Eastern Epic ; Literary History ; Mythological Intertextuality ; Hellenistic Poetry ; Roman poetry ; Metapoetry ; Metapoetics ; Literary Self-reflexivity
Share: