Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.774367
Title: Back to the great outdoors? : a Kantian reply to Meillassoux's argument
Author: Lovat, Toby
ISNI:       0000 0004 7961 571X
Awarding Body: University of Brighton
Current Institution: University of Brighton
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 28 Nov 2020
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
In this thesis I develop both immanent and extrinsic critiques of Meillassoux's argument, principally as it is developed and articulated in his book After Finitude. Meillassoux's ambitious project is assessed in detail. While I concede that the anti-realism developed in the shadow of Kant's legacy has a produced a profound rift between philosophical and scientific discourse, I contend that Meillassoux's argument tacitly conflates epistemology with ontology. Most pressing, however, is that his central argument is predicated on a misreading of Kant's idealism. I defend the epistemological interpretation of Kant's idealism over the traditional metaphysical reading, and argue that Kant's transcendental idealism and his empirical realism not only accommodates the 'literal' truth of ancestral claims but also demonstrates that what counts as real depends on an intuitive-epistemic framework: a standpoint. Moreover, I demonstrate that Meillassoux's argument is predicated on, and permeated by, what Kant refers to as transcendental error, the upshot of which is a tacit adherence to dogmatism and the generation of antinomies.
Supervisor: Brecher, Bob ; Devenney, Mark Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.774367  DOI: Not available
Share: