Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.773747
Title: Re-evaluating creativity in documentary filmmaking, creative analysis and creative constraints
Author: Sobron, Fernando
ISNI:       0000 0004 7960 9926
Awarding Body: University of Sussex
Current Institution: University of Sussex
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Please try the link below.
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis presents an evaluation of creativity in documentary films through practice and critical theory. It argues for a more prominent consideration of the creative input in the production of documentary films, which has been neglected in the field, and often approached indirectly, coded as form, style or authorship. It employs creative practice as a mode of enquiry and explores scholarly criticism and theory from a practitioner's perspective. Its written part is structured in three chapters: the first looks into realities and myths of creativity through the lens of the cognitive sciences, and elaborates on their findings' usefulness to documentary film as creative analysis; the second explores the influence of documentary critical theory, expectations created of the film mode and practitioners' approaches in the representation of reality; the third engages in documentary film as creative analysis, seeing films as creative negotiations of representational constraints. The thesis borrows from cognitive science and psychology ideas, methods and vocabulary for a critical creative analysis. It develops the analysis with attention to creative development and the problematisation of the film mode. Central to the proposed conceptual shift is the idea of 'creative constraints' as a useful frame for creativity. Building on ideas proposed by Jon Elster and Thomas Elsaesser, the thesis discusses the filmmaker's choice and acceptance of self imposed creative constraints to structure their creative challenge, giving defining character to authorial approach and film results. The idea of creatively constraining a film and analysis of its creative development are put into practice in three experimental films, which form the practical part of the research. Each film was produced with a set of predetermined constraints in order to evaluate their consequences on the films' forms and narrative, making practice integral to the enquiry. The first film, Mechanising the Catch, documents the arrival and processing of a fish catch at a port. The most obvious obstruction imposed on its production was to make use of social media video, specifically the one with the most extreme format impositions, Vine.co. For the second, Filling the Gaps, the most relevant creative constraint was to indirectly, through narrative development, call attention to the intervention of the spectator's imagination in the construction of a documentary film. It explores the making of Albrecht Dürer's 1515 rhinoceros engraving and enacts parallels to Dürer's methods. The third, Loullabelle's Café, explores natural constraints like access and ethics in the production of a documentary film. The film contains fictional sequences complemented with a documentary. The thesis mobilises cognitive science's conceptual tools for demystifying creativity, suggesting parallels in documentary whereby the creative demands of the film mode are made visible. Together with the idea of self-imposed creative constraints, this leads to a reappraisal and re-evaluation of the balance of creativity in a documentary. It is a reminder of the fundamental intervention of creative input in documentary film in two aspects, creative interpretation and creative approach. The thesis proposes looking at documentaries as creative challenges to the use of the film media to represent the real, mediation and other constraints, and suggests each director's instantiation of a documentary handles these differently. In line with these ideas and supplementing existing definitions, the thesis offers a definition of documentary by reference to creative constraints.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.773747  DOI: Not available
Keywords: BF0408 Creative processes. Imagination. Invention ; PN1995.9.D6 Documentary films
Share: