Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Postnationalism and archaeology in the twenty-first century : a critical analysis of the case of Romania
Author: Hanscam, Emily Ruth
ISNI:       0000 0004 7654 0062
Awarding Body: Durham University
Current Institution: Durham University
Date of Award: 2019
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Restricted access.
Access from Institution:
Archaeologists have long recognised the deep connection between archaeology and nationalism. The momentous changes in the political landscape of the past decade demand renewed scrutiny of this persistent relationship. A postnational critique offers the potential to understand how the study of the past intersects with national narratives and articulates new ways of acting against it. In contrast to recent archaeological research that has focused on postcolonialism, this thesis argues for an urgent return to, and critical analysis of, the fundamental relationship that lies at the heart of the nation-state project. The postnational critique advanced here identifies and questions the use of material and textual evidence from the past in support of methodological nationalism. It argues against the perpetuation of exclusive categories of identity and dualities such as 'civilisation versus barbarism'. These issues are explored in modern-day Romania, which is a valuable example due to its physical and conceptual 'marginality' in relation to Western Europe and its strong and regionally distinct appeal to the past. This thesis examines how Romanian nationalism developed in relation to the archaeological evidence found within its territory. The history of modern Romania is examined through a postnationalist lens over the longue durée. This demonstrates that, although the narratives can be written as constrained by the interests and limitations of previous research traditions, it is possible to identify themes that advance a postnationalist perspective. Even pasts which have been deployed in support of nationalism can be re-imagined to advance more inclusive accounts. While archaeological research continues to be used, deliberately or subconsciously, to support nationalism, the postnational critique suggests possible alternatives. This approach potentially can transform narratives of the past in support of a new and more inclusive future. As such, this thesis advocates for greater politicisation of archaeology, and archaeologists, as a force for positive change.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available