Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768050
Title: Overconfidence, ability and gender effects in an experimental financial market
Author: Zhao, Xinran
Awarding Body: Cardiff University
Current Institution: Cardiff University
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis investigates individual's overconfidence bias within the context of an experimental asset market. I relate overconfidence, gender differences and ability in judgement to individual's trading performance and trading activities. The most robust finding that was found in the psychology of judgment issue, with people found to be generally overconfident and evidence of this overconfidence seen in several disciplines. In the financial market, the theoretical models predict that overconfident investors trade excessively. Consequently, trading too much is hazardous to investors' wealth and performances. To contribute to the emerging literature on this topic, overall, 376 participants were involved in an experimental study, through which their degree of overconfidence in judgement have been measured using subjective confidence interval estimation (miscalibration test). In addition to misclaribration score, other psychological bias measures and control variables are also included. During the financial experiments, those individuals were allowed to trade with the virtual agents or against other participants given certain endowments of both cash and shares, depending on the trading rules of each experimental market. By varying the market structure, trading data was collected which that enables us to obtain a much better picture in relation to the actual individuals' behaviour in this experimental environment.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.768050  DOI: Not available
Share: