Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.764432
Title: Understanding the nature of therapeutic relationships in severe mental illness
Author: Shattock, Lucy
ISNI:       0000 0004 7655 9601
Awarding Body: University of Manchester
Current Institution: University of Manchester
Date of Award: 2016
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Paper 1 provides a systematic review of studies investigating therapeutic alliance in the context of psychological interventions for people with psychosis. Twenty-six studies were identified that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The review comments on the nature of alliance across studies, the extent to which alliance predicted outcome, as well as client, therapist and therapy-related factors associated with alliance. Clinical implications are discussed and research recommendations are made. Paper 2 details an investigation into the relationships between attachment, therapeutic alliance and service engagement in a Black sample with psychosis. Twenty eight participants with non-affective psychosis were recruited across a number of outpatient and inpatient services. Participants completed measures of attachment, alliance and service engagement. Staff completed measures of alliance and service engagement. Psychotic symptoms and perceived racial/ethnic discrimination were measured as potential confounders. Results indicated that higher attachment anxiety was associated with poorer client-rated alliance but not staff-rated alliance, except on the goal agreement component. Attachment avoidance was not related to alliance. Attachment was not associated with service engagement. Attachment ratings were also compared to secondary data collected from a large White sample. Clinical implications are discussed and areas for future research are highlighted. Paper 3 provides a critical appraisal of the design, implementation and interpretation of findings for Papers 1 and 2. Strengths and limitations of both papers are discussed, and personal reflections about the research process are included.
Supervisor: Berry, Katherine ; Edge, Dawn Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.764432  DOI: Not available
Share: