Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.762471
Title: Exploring the impact and experience of living with dystonia
Author: Morgan, Andrew
ISNI:       0000 0004 7656 9105
Awarding Body: Lancaster University
Current Institution: Lancaster University
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
This thesis is a discussion of the impact and experience of living with dystonia. The literature review investigated factors relating to health related quality of life (HRQOL) for people living with dystonia. The main research paper used interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore the experiences of people living with the condition. The thesis concludes with a critical appraisal of the two papers and the process of working with two different research paradigms. The literature review found that depression and anxiety had a significant, negative impact on HRQOL. Dystonia severity and psychosocial variables such as body concept and self-esteem were also implicated. A series of pervasive issues had a negative impact on the methodological quality of reviewed studies. These include a lack of engagement with key concepts such as HRQOL, depression and anxiety. Suggestions were made for future research designs. The main research paper produced three themes: (1) Dealing with ignorance and uncertainty: navigating health services with a rare, poorly understood condition; (2) The challenge of social isolation: overcoming barriers to positive social identity; and (3) Fear of psychological explanations: the impact of stigmatised attitudes towards psychological explanations for dystonia symptoms. Participants described their experiences of isolation and alienation which resulted from having a rare, visible and chronic health condition. Academic and clinical implications were discussed. Finally, the critical appraisal reflected on the process of writing using two different research paradigms. Adherence to the philosophical assumptions of each approach was considered a strength of the thesis. The limitations of the two approaches were discussed as well as recommendations for further research on dystonia.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.762471  DOI:
Share: