Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.761876
Title: Testing two models of delivering and maintaining life skills training in a secondary school setting
Author: Murray, Charmaine
ISNI:       0000 0004 7653 9184
Awarding Body: University of Glasgow
Current Institution: University of Glasgow
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a peer delivered wellbeing intervention for pupils within a Scottish secondary school setting comparing peer-trained class facilitators and CBT-trained class facilitators. To gather feedback on the experience of being a class facilitator. Design: A pre-post, mixed-methods design was utilised. Setting: Religious Moral Citizenship and Education (RMCE) classes in a Scottish secondary school. Participants: Nineteen sixth year class facilitators were recruited and randomly allocated to peer-led (N = 10) or CBT (N = 9) training. Eight classes of third year secondary school pupils were allocated to two conditions. Four classes (n = 100) taught by peer-trained class facilitators and four classes (n = 95) taught by CBT-trained class facilitators Intervention: ‘My Big Life’ is a shortened, simplified version of the Living Life to the Full (LLTTF) young person’s course. My Big Life’ contains four sessions centred upon feelings, behaviour, thinking and problem solving. It was delivered over four weeks by the class facilitators. Outcome measures: The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) was administered at baseline, post-intervention and three-month follow-up. The Training Acceptability Rating Scale was administered to the class facilitators post training and to the 3rd year students’ post-intervention. Two focus groups were completed post-intervention with the peer-trained class facilitators (n = 4) and CBT trained class facilitators (n = 3). Results: There was a significant improvement in wellbeing for pupils with initial low well-being scores provided with training by CBT trained class facilitators (p = 0.01). Overall, those with lower initial wellbeing scores showed greater improvement than those with initial high wellbeing scores. Pupils rated the intervention as being beneficial. Class facilitators identified a number of benefits from participating in the programme. Difficulties and suggested improvements were also highlighted. Conclusions: A short intervention delivered by student class facilitators can lead to wellbeing improvements, particularly for those with lower initial wellbeing scores. Peer-led training appeared to be as effective as CBT led training and suggests that peer training may be an effective model to transfer skills to further year groups. However, further research is warranted in order to make more substantial recommendations.
Supervisor: Not available Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (D.Clin.Psy.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.761876  DOI: Not available
Keywords: BF Psychology
Share: