Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.761087
Title: Farmer innovation for improvement of animal health and welfare : a comparison of different policy interventions to enhance practice-led innovation for animal health and welfare improvement
Author: Van Dijk, Lisa
ISNI:       0000 0004 7432 7487
Awarding Body: University of Bristol
Current Institution: University of Bristol
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 01 Jan 2099
Access from Institution:
Abstract:
Encouraging farmers to adopt more animal-health and welfare-friendly husbandry practices remains a critical challenge for animal-welfare improvement. This thesis, operating at the critical intersection of the applied animal welfare and social sciences disciplines, examines, evaluates and demonstrates the potential of practice-led innovation processes in the context of applied animal welfare science and animal welfare practice change to improve animal health and welfare. A series of recent policy interventions case studies, with a strong practice-led approach to enhance farmer innovation for animal health and welfare improvement, were investigated, documented and analysed: a new collaborative learning approach for farmer-led Participatory Policy Making aimed at reducing antibiotic use in dairy cattle (initiated by two dairy producer groups, the Waitrose Dairy Farmers and Coombe Farm) and a practice-led innovation approach used in the laying hen sector (promoted by the EU-H2020-funded Hennovation project). In the empirical sections of this thesis, these interventions were ́tested ́ and compared with a more conventional top-down regulatory/compliance approach to practice change, in this instance, existing and new initiatives to engage farmers in on-farm welfare-assessment approaches to promote welfare-improvement through farm assurance promoted by the AssureWel project. The research findings demonstrated that practice-led approaches provide, clear tangible benefits for farmers and lead to stronger relationships with other farmers, suppliers and support actors and networks. And provided evidence that practice-led innovation could offer an alternative approach and an effective mechanism for generating animal welfare practice change and innovation (or a certain kind of innovation) at the ‘on-the-ground’ level of farming practice. The examination of the three interventions shows that opportunities and advantages exist for the enhanced integration of more participatory approaches to farmer innovation in future strategy and policy initiatives, alongside more conventional advisory pathways and other welfare-improvement strategies. Recommendations are offered to enhance and support practice-led approaches to farmer innovation for animal health and welfare improvement.
Supervisor: Reyher, Kristen ; Mullan, Siobhan Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID: uk.bl.ethos.761087  DOI: Not available
Share: