Use this URL to cite or link to this record in EThOS:
Title: Shakespeare and the Renaissance reception of Euripides
Author: Suthren, Carla
ISNI:       0000 0004 7431 9110
Awarding Body: University of York
Current Institution: University of York
Date of Award: 2018
Availability of Full Text:
Access from EThOS:
Full text unavailable from EThOS. Thesis embargoed until 06 Sep 2023
Access from Institution:
This thesis investigates the Renaissance reception of Euripides, arguing that Greek tragedy had a direct and important influence on Shakespeare. Euripides, I demonstrate, was both more widely accessible and more culturally significant than has generally been recognized. Beginning with Erasmus and ending with Milton, I establish the foundation of a detailed and historically specific understanding of how Euripides’ works were being read and understood. Paying close attention to the materiality of Euripides’ textual appearances across a variety of dramatic and non-dramatic texts and contexts, I set Shakespeare’s relationship to Greek tragedy within a more precise framework. The first three chapters set the reception of Euripides in the context of sixteenth-century European humanism. Chapter 1 argues that Erasmus established modes of reading Euripides that were enduringly influential, examining Euripides’ place in humanist curricula and teaching materials, followed by the translations of Euripides by Erasmus and Buchanan. Chapter 2 considers the material forms in which Euripides appeared before the Renaissance reader, especially the paratexts which shaped (or attempted to shape) the reader’s experience of Euripides. Chapter 3 turns to look at the two surviving translations of Euripides into English. The next two chapters focus in on Shakespeare. Chapter 4 briefly surveys the critical landscape, examining parallels between specific plays, but also opening out the discussion to include genre. Chapter 5 examines Shakespeare’s most extensive engagement with Euripides, offering a fresh reading of The Winter’s Tale as a meaningful reception of Alcestis. Finally, Chapter 6 traces Milton’s receptions of Euripides in relation to sixteenth-century trends, arguing that Samson Agonistes stands on the brink of a turn towards Sophocles that was beginning to occur as Aristotle’s Poetics gained a new kind of dominance over the interpretation of tragedy. But Milton’s poetic instincts remain Euripidean, gesturing to a chain of receptions leading back to Erasmus.
Supervisor: Demetriou, Tania ; Martindale, Charles Sponsor: Not available
Qualification Name: Thesis (Ph.D.) Qualification Level: Doctoral
EThOS ID:  DOI: Not available